1. A Crisis of Trust, Not Just Religion
The standard account frames 1688 as a Protestant nation rejecting a Catholic king, but the religious dimension was inseparable from a deeper political anxiety. James II was not simply devout; he was understood by his opponents to be dismantling the legal and parliamentary frameworks that governed the relationship between crown and subject. His use of the royal dispensing power to exempt individuals from laws passed by Parliament struck many as a claim that the king stood above statute. When a male heir was born in 1688, guaranteeing a Catholic succession, the combination of dynastic permanence and perceived executive overreach became intolerable to a critical faction of the political establishment.
Why it matters: Understanding the crisis as constitutional rather than purely confessional explains why it produced lasting institutional change rather than simply a change of monarch.